<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some useful insight into what is and isn&#8217;t working in Facebook and Twitter marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://givinginadigitalworld.org/2010/01/13/some-useful-insight-into-what-is-and-isnt-working-in-facebook-and-twitter-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://givinginadigitalworld.org/2010/01/13/some-useful-insight-into-what-is-and-isnt-working-in-facebook-and-twitter-marketing/</link>
	<description>Digital fundraising thoughts and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:32:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nonprofitplace</title>
		<link>http://givinginadigitalworld.org/2010/01/13/some-useful-insight-into-what-is-and-isnt-working-in-facebook-and-twitter-marketing/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nonprofitplace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://givinginadigitalworld.wordpress.com/?p=1610#comment-1155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing that I notice about both B2B and B2C lists is that the range of respondents does not vary very widely, from 22% to 40% in the first case and 24% to 46% in the second (twitter), and 24% to 37%, 27% to 41% (facebook).

The conclusion, i think, is that the method of use and its consequent success is still very much organisation dependant.

It would be interesting to see a comparator survey of uses of both social media by non-profits and their respective success rates.

http://non-profitplace.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that I notice about both B2B and B2C lists is that the range of respondents does not vary very widely, from 22% to 40% in the first case and 24% to 46% in the second (twitter), and 24% to 37%, 27% to 41% (facebook).</p>
<p>The conclusion, i think, is that the method of use and its consequent success is still very much organisation dependant.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see a comparator survey of uses of both social media by non-profits and their respective success rates.</p>
<p><a href="http://non-profitplace.com" rel="nofollow">http://non-profitplace.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://givinginadigitalworld.org/2010/01/13/some-useful-insight-into-what-is-and-isnt-working-in-facebook-and-twitter-marketing/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://givinginadigitalworld.wordpress.com/?p=1610#comment-1136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve seen centrepoint advertising their sponsor a room product all over facebook - I&#039;d love to know how successful this has been; although they have also been using full page press ads as well.

Anyone from centrepoint care to share?

Jonny]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen centrepoint advertising their sponsor a room product all over facebook &#8211; I&#8217;d love to know how successful this has been; although they have also been using full page press ads as well.</p>
<p>Anyone from centrepoint care to share?</p>
<p>Jonny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Carnell</title>
		<link>http://givinginadigitalworld.org/2010/01/13/some-useful-insight-into-what-is-and-isnt-working-in-facebook-and-twitter-marketing/#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Carnell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://givinginadigitalworld.wordpress.com/?p=1610#comment-1127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some great data and fully tracks with my experiences @BullyingUK Organic marketing is much more successful than the PPC adverts in Facebook. Interesting to read number two on that list, &quot;Friending from corporate profiles&quot; I assume we are talking profiles setup in the name of a brand rather than a Fan Page?

Always assumed that was a breach of the TandC&#039;s not that it stops brands doing it anyway :-) and I would even recommend it to charities as well, it&#039;s effective for building relationships.

Awesome data ;-)

John]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great data and fully tracks with my experiences @BullyingUK Organic marketing is much more successful than the PPC adverts in Facebook. Interesting to read number two on that list, &#8220;Friending from corporate profiles&#8221; I assume we are talking profiles setup in the name of a brand rather than a Fan Page?</p>
<p>Always assumed that was a breach of the TandC&#8217;s not that it stops brands doing it anyway <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  and I would even recommend it to charities as well, it&#8217;s effective for building relationships.</p>
<p>Awesome data <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://givinginadigitalworld.org/2010/01/13/some-useful-insight-into-what-is-and-isnt-working-in-facebook-and-twitter-marketing/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://givinginadigitalworld.wordpress.com/?p=1610#comment-1126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Adrian, thanks for sharing the details of your Facebook campaign. I think you&#039;re right that the best use of such ads is to offer a low involvement engagement opportunity to a targeted audience as the first step in a journey towards any form of fundraising activity. 

Where I&#039;ve seen particularly bad results is when organisations have tried to use them for a one-step direct financial ask.

If any readers have seen such an approach work then do share the details.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adrian, thanks for sharing the details of your Facebook campaign. I think you&#8217;re right that the best use of such ads is to offer a low involvement engagement opportunity to a targeted audience as the first step in a journey towards any form of fundraising activity. </p>
<p>Where I&#8217;ve seen particularly bad results is when organisations have tried to use them for a one-step direct financial ask.</p>
<p>If any readers have seen such an approach work then do share the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Salmon</title>
		<link>http://givinginadigitalworld.org/2010/01/13/some-useful-insight-into-what-is-and-isnt-working-in-facebook-and-twitter-marketing/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Salmon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://givinginadigitalworld.wordpress.com/?p=1610#comment-1125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is interesting Bryan - we have just had great success in using Facebook advertising - paid for by cost per impression - to recruit our alumni on Facebook to our Facebook group. We got 1500 more members over 9 days. And our own website stats show that referrals from Facebook to our website went up by 2200% during the time we ran the campaign, compared to the same period last year, taking it from generating 0.3% of website visits to nearly 5%.

I&#039;d count that as a success and I think it worked because we were asking people to do the easiest possible thing on Facebook - just join the group and let us know they were interested in us. I&#039;m convinced that Facebook and social media marketing in general needs to focus on securing the &#039;noncomittal gesture of support&#039; - if you can get that, then you can follow up with other media that are better placed for securing actual commitments....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting Bryan &#8211; we have just had great success in using Facebook advertising &#8211; paid for by cost per impression &#8211; to recruit our alumni on Facebook to our Facebook group. We got 1500 more members over 9 days. And our own website stats show that referrals from Facebook to our website went up by 2200% during the time we ran the campaign, compared to the same period last year, taking it from generating 0.3% of website visits to nearly 5%.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d count that as a success and I think it worked because we were asking people to do the easiest possible thing on Facebook &#8211; just join the group and let us know they were interested in us. I&#8217;m convinced that Facebook and social media marketing in general needs to focus on securing the &#8216;noncomittal gesture of support&#8217; &#8211; if you can get that, then you can follow up with other media that are better placed for securing actual commitments&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

